h1

Intro to podcast 2

July 23, 2015

The podcast has changed some and I need a new intro to send to potential guests. 

Thanks for forwarding on this message to people who might be good candidates for being a guest on our podcast.

Embedded.fm is the weekly show for people who love building gadgets. Our guests include makers, entrepreneurs, educators, and normal, traditional engineers. We talk about the how, why, and what of engineering, usually devices.

The audience consists mostly of hardware and software engineers. The show is in iTunes and Stitcher or you can get it directly from embedded.fm.

I’m interested in talking to people about their systems: how does it work? how did you develop it?  how did you fund it? what’s your favorite tool? did you set up a manufacturing line and where? how do you teach people to do this? what draws you to engineering?

Recording takes about 90 minutes, it isn’t live so mistakes can be removed, and you shouldn’t have to prep much since I want to talk to you about something you already know. I prefer to record in our home studio near San Jose and Campbell, California but we can do recording via the Internet (Skype).

While this is sort of advertising for for my book and our consulting company, we don’t really discuss them (except to say, yep, still there). I do this mostly because I like to talk to interesting people about their jobs…  and maybe to have a few more women’s voices talking about technology (but not necessarily about being women-in-tech). That isn’t to say it is only women guests, we are happy to talk to just about anyone who is enthusiastic about science, technology, engineering, and math.

Interested? Know someone who might be interested? Please send a message.

Thank you!

Elecia

h1

Women-in-tech activities

July 17, 2015

I go to the occasional women-in-tech things. I’ve been to Grace Hopper, once as attendee, once as a speaker/manager bringing her team. I read Systers for years but don’t currently, it is just too much sometimes.

Actually, that sums up my feelings about women-in-tech events pretty well: it is just too much sometimes.  And yet.

I like to attend women-in-tech things because it is nice to see women happy as engineers. Too many times, I hear the horror stories. But there are many people, many women, untouched (or only slightly touched) by the trolls, stalkers, and jerks of the internet. I like to be reminded that it isn’t always awful.

And I go because I get a little lonely in my job sometimes. I like to connect with people who might be in the same boat, maybe offer some advice to those more junior in their career, maybe receive some advice from those more senior.

I also go to find podcast guests. I’m not shy in trying to get a gender balanced podcast despite the lack of gender balance in embedded systems. That means I have to search a little more, work a little harder to get women guests. So I go to women-in-tech meetups hoping to find people.

Though, I’m fairly terrible (stressed) in crowds and I find that seems to be getting worse as I get older. I can pretend to be an extrovert for about 4.5 minutes (8 with alcohol). Then I get jittery and want to throw up. Reeeeallllly Jekyll and Hyde-y.

I went to an event this week. It was ok. There was no alcohol. And the demos (from the hosting company) were done by men (though they were nice, it just seemed like a missed opportunity to highlight some women’s achievements). At least the talks were done by interesting, engaging women… though they were a little long. As someone there for the networking (4.5 minutes of it anyway), I don’t want detailed technical presentations.

It got me thinking about what I’d want to do if I was putting on a women-in-tech event. So let me write these ideas down, maybe it will plant a seed for later.

1. There shall be alcohol. All networking events should have beer and wine.

2. Food will be primarily vegan. Because, crap, I’m tired of not being sure what is safe for my socially-nervous and vegetarian stomach to eat. Maybe steak strips or meatballs too, but everything else will be vegan. Sometimes at these things all I want is a little peanut butter and jelly sandwich. And there will be dessert but it will served later (halfway through), not set out with the food. Dessert doesn’t have to be all vegan.

3. There will be seating but not quite enough of it.

4. For a 3 hour event, there will be four to six 5-minute talks, three at T+30min hour, three at T+65min. The goal of the talks is to create discussion and getting people to talk to each other, not to give speakers platforms. The talks act as ice breakers, the speakers will know that.

5. Badges will have first names only. There will be small stickers for different interests. If it is hosted by a company, they will have small stickers so it is easy to pick out people who work there.

6. There will be different themes in different parts of the room. They will be clearly marked: “I’d love to meet you” (seating and food), “We’d love for you to join our conversation” (seating), “We’re happy in our conversation, give us a minute” (tables but no seating). People won’t have to declare themselves, just stand in the right place. Ok, this one is sort of dumb. Maybe scratch it out and put in a networking/mixer game thingy.

7. It will be a women in tech focused event but open to anyone who wants to support getting more women interested and retained in engineering, math, technology, and science. You do not have to identify as female to come.

8. There will be a few people who are asked specifically to act as hosts, who spend the evening meeting people then introducing them to each other.

9. We will make some horrible mistake against feminism (giving out lipstick, having men do demos, handing out hot pink rape whistles) so that everyone can be aghast at something.

Oh no! We’ve reach the cynicism level. Don’t go deeper, it gets very dark in there.

I’ve been to great meetups, both gendered and not specific. One GirlGeekDinner was fantastic, another one I was lost at. The OSHPark Bring a Hack Maker Fair after party is pretty amazing: Laen gets people there and mingling with each other. Some of that is because they are fascinating people and because we’re told to bring something which creates an icebreaker. But there is something else too.

I don’t know what that something else is. I suppose if I did, I’d bottle it and make millions.

Anyway, there are many women-in-tech things and something always goes oddly but I’m not ready to give up on them yet. Though I’m not ready to throw my own either.

 

h1

The Words We Use Define Us

April 12, 2015

Did I tell you about “recalcitrant”?

Over a decade ago, I was having a conference call with Audible, I’d been working with them for a few weeks, maybe a month.

Small aside: Audible’s hold “music” is the audio book of Charlotte’s Web. I was always a little sad when a meeting actually started. LeapFrog had the second best hold music: children’s singalong songs… meetings often started with people trailing off their singing as the music cut off.

For this status meeting, I had three or four tasks and had not finished the highest priority one, instead finishing the others. I said that the tough one was being recalcitrant. I was hoping to avoid getting into the details because I knew there was a memory leak and that it was deep in the way the operating system works. I rapidly went on to the completed tasks so I portray it all very positively.

When I finished my spiel, one of the guys on the phone (who were all smart and exactly what you’d expect from Audible-before-bought-by-Amazon engineers)… one of the guys asked “what do you mean by recalcitrant?” so I went ahead and explained that I knew the symptoms and would figure it out soon. I apologized for not getting it done, I acknowledged it was the highest priority and I would get it done quickly. You know, I was really trying to be a professional. It was my first contract gig.

Same guy (name redacted to protect a super nice guy) said, “No, what do you mean by recalcitrant?”

There was a long pause, I didn’t know what he meant.

I mispronounce many, many words. I think all readers have this problem. Let’s just say “impugned” does not have a hard-g sound something I found that out a month or two ago when my husband near fell in the parking lot of the library as he was laughing too hard to see.

I was pretty sure: re-kal-si-trant. But knowing me, I went ahead and spelled it. And asked if I was saying it wrong. I was so embarrassed but I didn’t want them to think I wasn’t willing to learn from them. Same guy says “But what does it mean?”

Not sure if he was yanking my chain but too busy pretending to be professional to get annoyed, I said it meant that the code was being fussy.

He asked if “recalcitrant” meant “fussy” and so I clue in that he’s simply asking for a definition. And so I go into teacher mode (why?) and said, not exactly, that recalcitrant means uncooperative and copping an attitude. I start in on the etymology (aren’t etymologies the coolest thing?).

Then I remember that my goal was to give my status and shut up. So I eventually shut up. The Audible guy thanks me for a new vocabulary word and we finally move on to the next person’s status report.

I have always wondered what everyone else on that conference call thought of that whole adventure.

h1

April Fool’s Joke

April 8, 2015

Over a thousand people have downloaded an episode of the embedded.fm where I interview our cat

At least three people listened to the whole thing, probably more. It was not our usual hour, only about 20 minutes but still I interviewed our cat. Chris piped up occasionally with the most hilarious additions. But I didn’t really expect other people to listen to the whole thing. I did it for my own amusement. I felt a bit guilty as it caused Chris lots of work (editing it was really tough! And yes, that was our cat though there were multiple recording sessions).

This is the first time I’ve ever participated in April Fools day. It has always been something I avoided or looked on with annoyed amusement (ThinkGeek, though, that is pure amusement).

There is a community to having done a prank like this. 

I found the episode really funny to plan, to do, and to listen to. It worked for me and even thinking about it now makes me want to giggle.

But a joke that is shared? It is much better.

h1

Special Effects

March 26, 2015

There is a contest to design a TV show that will draw people to engineering the way that MacGyver did for so many of us. And they want a woman protagonist. You can see the contest rules and enter at TheNextMacGyver.com. This is one of my entries.

Title: Special Effects

Genre: Comedy, family drama

Logline (summary):

Running a live educational children’s program is not easy. The show must go on even when everything is broken: Micah had better start fixing this mess, right now.

Pilot synopsis:

On the stage of a live, educations children’s TV show, everything works perfectly. All of the puppets are in good repair, all of the robots work without error, each light is timed perfectly, and even the rails for the camera are working as planned. Every special effect works exactly as intended.

Micah receives congratulations from her coworkers on her fantastic engineering skills, becoming more deeply unhappy with each accolade. Her boss, knowing her well, says he’s certain she’ll come up with something better next time.

Micah is an artist and engineer. She likes to learn and try new things. She’s sick of everyone telling her how awesome her job is (she knows). She gets bored with doing the same thing the same way each time. This tendency to change things, even working things, often leads her into trouble.

Main Character Description:

In her mid-20 and pretty, Micah can weld, work in a shop, use a soldering iron, and program a computer. She has minions to help her but she does the bulk of engineering for the show. She knows how to make it all work; fixing anything that needs it, possibly a few things that don’t. (Mythbusters showed that awesome engineering skills are needed for special effects and stunts, she could have been Adam, if they’d only cast Mythbusters better.)

Three Sample Episode Storylines:

  1. One of the puppeteers gets sick, Micah has to fill in. The work is hot and sweaty so she builds robotics to replace herself. The creature stops moving on live TV and emits smoke. Tears (and hilarity) ensue.
  2. Micah talks her producer into letting her build a robot. Now she has to give it personality but the darn thing is just a lump of metal without personality (well, occasionally it is creepy but definitely not the R2D2 she’d dreamed up for herself).
  3. A favorite reading puppet is destroyed when a child vomits on it. Micah rebuilds the skeleton and skin before the next show.
  4. Micah gets a helper: a boy who uses his Make-A-Wish to see how the eyes glow in his favorite creature. In a quiet episode, she shows how accomplishes this effect in a way anyone can follow.